BlendedBoris Blog: Simple Blockchain Ownership Registration

Gruffalo AI Copies: What the Illustrator's Possible Lawsuit Means for Blender Character Artists (2026) | Blended BORIS | Digital Art IP

Axel Scheffler, the illustrator who drew The Gruffalo, says he is considering legal action after ChatGPT produced pictures of his character on request. In an interview with the German weekly Die Zeit, published on 17 October 2026, he said he would prefer to go to court together with other artists, and that he is talking to his publishers about support. No lawsuit has been filed yet.
Scheffler works with traditional, non-digital methods, and his Gruffalo is one of the best-known picture book characters in the world. Die Zeit asked ChatGPT for a Gruffalo picture and got images within minutes that look strikingly like his drawings. His complaint is not about a vague resemblance in mood or colour. He says the character itself is his, and only the backgrounds differ.
His case would not be the first of its kind in Germany. Two children's book publishers have already sued OpenAI in Munich over ChatGPT copies of their characters, and the same Munich court ruled against OpenAI over song lyrics in 2025. For Blender artists who design characters, mascots and creatures, these cases are a preview of how European courts may treat AI copies of a character, and of the evidence an artist needs to bring.
TL;DR: the Gruffalo story in one paragraph

On 17 October 2026, Gruffalo illustrator Axel Scheffler told Die Zeit he is considering suing AI companies because ChatGPT generates pictures of his character. He has not filed a claim. OpenAI says it is reviewing the allegations and respects creators' rights. In Munich, Penguin Random House sued OpenAI in March 2026 over the Little Dragon Coconut books, and Carlsen sued in August 2026 over Das NEINhorn; neither case has a reported ruling. The lesson for 3D artists: a character is protected by copyright as a concrete design, a style is not, and the artist who can show a dated, detailed record of the original character is in the strongest position when a copy turns up.

What did the Gruffalo illustrator say about ChatGPT?

Scheffler's interview was picked up by the German news agency dpa and by outlets such as heise online. Three points stand out. He is considering legal action. He would like to join forces with other artists rather than sue alone. And he is in talks with his publishers about possible support, while still taking legal advice.
His reaction to the AI images was blunt. In the English version of the dpa report he is quoted as saying:
“I'm appalled - that's quite clearly my character, only the backgrounds look completely different to how I draw them.”
Axel Scheffler, quoted by dpa, 17 October 2026
That sentence matters legally. Scheffler is not only complaining that an AI imitates the way he draws. He is saying the output shows his specific character: the shape, the features and the details that make the Gruffalo recognisable. Copyright law treats those two complaints very differently, as we explain below.

How has OpenAI responded?

OpenAI told dpa it is looking into the allegations. In its statement it said:
“We respect the rights of creators and content owners, and are having productive conversations with many publishers around the world.”
OpenAI statement, quoted by dpa, 17 October 2026
According to the Die Zeit report, OpenAI's position in the existing German cases is that its models do not store works like a database and do not deliberately reproduce content one to one; they learn patterns and relationships and generate new content from them. Whether that defence works when the output shows a recognisable character is exactly what the Munich courts are being asked to decide.

Which lawsuits against OpenAI are already running in Germany?

Scheffler would be joining a line of German cases. All of them are in Munich, and all of them argue that a work which can be pulled out of a model in recognisable form has been copied into it.
  • GEMA v. OpenAI (song lyrics). On 11 November 2025, the Munich Regional Court ruled that ChatGPT's memorisation and output of song lyrics infringed copyright and largely granted the music rights society GEMA's claims. OpenAI appealed in December 2025, so the judgment is not final.
  • Penguin Random House v. OpenAI (Little Dragon Coconut). The publishing group filed suit on 27 March 2026 at the Munich Regional Court over Ingo Siegner's Der kleine Drache Kokosnuss books. It alleges ChatGPT reproduces recognisable passages, generates illustrations of the dragon that are confusingly similar to the originals, and even offers to prepare a print-ready manuscript with a cover and self-publishing instructions. The German Publishers and Booksellers Association backs the suit.
  • Carlsen v. OpenAI (Das NEINhorn). On 19 August 2026, Carlsen, author Marc-Uwe Kling and illustrator Astrid Henn sued OpenAI at the Munich I Regional Court. Their complaint says ChatGPT offered print-ready layouts for illustrated NEINhorn stories, including a made-up ISBN and a publisher's logo.
  • GEMA v. Suno (music). In a judgment GEMA announced on 31 July 2026, the same Munich court found that the AI music generator Suno infringed copyright and must take a licence and pay compensation. It is a music case, but it shows the court's approach to models that store and output protected works.
Neither of the two book cases has a reported ruling yet, and OpenAI disputes the claims. Still, the pattern is clear: German rights holders are not arguing about abstract style. They show the court a prompt, an output and the original, and ask whether the output reproduces the protected work.
CaseWork or characterFiled or decidedCourtStatus (22 Oct 2026)
Axel Scheffler (illustrator)The GruffaloInterview 17 Oct 2026None yetConsidering legal action, ideally with other artists; no claim filed
Penguin Random House v. OpenAIDer kleine Drache Kokosnuss (Ingo Siegner)Filed 27 Mar 2026Munich Regional CourtPending; no ruling reported
Carlsen, Kling and Henn v. OpenAIDas NEINhornFiled 19 Aug 2026Munich I Regional CourtPending; no ruling reported
GEMA v. OpenAISong lyricsRuled 11 Nov 2025Munich Regional CourtGEMA largely won; OpenAI appealed, not final
GEMA v. SunoMusic repertoireJudgment announced 31 Jul 2026Munich Regional CourtCourt found infringement; licence and compensation required

Is a character protected, or only the drawings?

Copyright protects expression, not ideas or styles. Nobody owns the idea of a hairy monster with horns, and nobody owns a loose, warm, hand-painted look. What copyright does protect is a concrete, original design: the particular combination of shapes, proportions, features and details that makes a character recognisable. When an AI output shows that combination, the question is no longer about style but about reproduction or adaptation of the protected work.
That is why Scheffler's wording is important, and why the book publishers in Munich focus on recognisable characters and near-identical illustrations. A claim that an AI "draws like me" is weak almost everywhere. A claim that an AI "draws my character" is much stronger, especially if the artist can put the original model sheets and dated files next to the output. Our guide to landmark copyright cases for 3D artists covers how courts have drawn this line over the years, and whether 3D models automatically have copyright explains how it applies to meshes and sculpts.
Characters can also be protected in other ways. A character name or look used to sell products can be registered as a trademark, and a product shape such as a figurine can be registered as a design. Our guides on copyright vs trademark vs patent and how to register a design in the EU, UK and US explain when each tool fits.

Why does this matter for Blender artists?

Most Blender artists are not famous picture book illustrators, but many work in exactly the area the Gruffalo case is about: original characters. Think of a stylised game hero sold as a rigged asset, a creature design in a portfolio, a mascot built for a client, or a printable figurine sold online. If a well-known character can be reproduced by a chatbot on request, smaller creators should assume their published characters can be imitated too, by image generators and by tools that turn images into 3D meshes.
We have seen the same pattern from several angles this month. A report found that AI image models reproduce copyrighted characters, ChatGPT was caught adding real cartoonists' signatures to AI cartoons, and makers found AI copies of their work flooding Etsy. The Gruffalo case adds a European, character-focused example, from an artist who works entirely by hand.
There is also a lesson about scale. Scheffler wants to sue together with other artists, and the German book cases are carried by large publishers with legal budgets. Individual 3D artists rarely have that support. That makes cheap, early evidence more important: if you cannot fund a long case, you at least need a file that makes your claim clear in a takedown notice, a marketplace complaint or a lawyer's first letter.
Keep dated proof of every character you design.

BlendedBoris is a Blender add-on that records a blockchain timestamp of your Blender files, so you can show what your character looked like, and when it existed, if a lookalike appears.

👉 See how BlendedBoris works

What evidence would a 3D character artist need?

The German complaints show what a strong case looks like: the original work, the prompt that produced the copy, the output, and a clear comparison. For a 3D character, the equivalent evidence is easy to collect while you work, and hard to rebuild later.
  • Development files. Early sketches, blockout .blend files, sculpt stages and the final model, each with a reliable date.
  • Model sheets and turnarounds. Front, side and back views, colour callouts and expression sheets that define what makes the character yours.
  • Publication record. Where and when you first showed the character: portfolio, ArtStation, store page, client delivery.
  • The copy, captured properly. Screenshots with date, URL, prompt and tool name, plus the downloaded output.
  • Registration where it counts. In the US, registration is needed before suing for infringement of a US work; see how to register copyright and art registration and registries.

What should Blender artists do now?

  1. List your original characters. Note which ones earn money or matter for your portfolio, and where each is published.
  2. Timestamp the source files. Record dated proof of the .blend files, sculpts and model sheets before you publish, not after a copy appears.
  3. Add clear notices. Put a copyright notice and an AI-use reservation on your store pages and portfolio; our copyright notice templates include wording for 3D artists.
  4. Register key characters. Consider copyright registration in the US and design or trademark registration for characters you merchandise.
  5. Test the tools yourself. Search image generators and AI 3D tools for your character's name and describe it; keep dated captures of anything that reproduces it.
  6. Act early and in writing. Use platform reporting, a takedown notice or a cease and desist letter before a copy spreads.
  7. Join forces. Like Scheffler, talk to other artists, your publisher, client or an artists' association; shared cases spread the cost.
  8. Know where you sell. The rules differ by country; our international copyright guide and international AI art laws overview cover the main differences.

How does this fit the bigger picture?

The Gruffalo story is about who controls a creative asset once it is out in the world. Our sister sites covered the same question this week for engineering data and design tools.
For more background on AI and artists' rights, see copyright disputes involving AI art and legal recourse against AI art theft, plus our recent news on the NoAI tag ruling in Beaulier v. Roblox, the first US appeals ruling on AI training and Meshy Edit and AI part-editing of 3D models.

Conclusion

Axel Scheffler has not sued anyone yet, but his reaction to ChatGPT's Gruffalo pictures puts a well-known face on a problem many artists share: AI tools that reproduce a recognisable character, not just a style. In Munich, publishers are already testing that argument against OpenAI, and the court that ruled on song lyrics in 2025 will now hear claims about illustrated characters. For Blender artists, the practical lesson does not depend on how those cases end. Know which characters are yours, keep dated records of how you made them, register the ones that matter, and be ready to show a clear side-by-side comparison when a copy appears.
Prove your characters are yours.

BlendedBoris adds a blockchain timestamp to your Blender files from inside Blender, giving you dated proof of authorship to sit alongside your model sheets, your copyright notice and your registrations.

👉 Get started with BlendedBoris

FAQ: the Gruffalo AI case and character copyright

Has the Gruffalo illustrator sued OpenAI?

No. In an interview with Die Zeit published on 17 October 2026, Axel Scheffler said he is considering legal action, ideally together with other artists, and is discussing support with his publishers. No claim had been reported as filed by 22 October 2026.

What did ChatGPT do with the Gruffalo?

According to Die Zeit, ChatGPT produced images within minutes when asked for a Gruffalo, and they closely resembled Scheffler's drawings. He said the character is clearly his and only the backgrounds differ.

What has OpenAI said?

OpenAI said it is reviewing the allegations, respects the rights of creators and content owners, and is in talks with many publishers. In the German cases it argues its models learn patterns and do not deliberately reproduce works one to one.

Which German cases against OpenAI involve characters?

Penguin Random House sued in March 2026 over Ingo Siegner's Little Dragon Coconut books, and Carlsen, Marc-Uwe Kling and Astrid Henn sued in August 2026 over Das NEINhorn. Both are in Munich and neither had a reported ruling by 22 October 2026.

Is an art style protected by copyright?

Generally no. Copyright protects concrete original expression, such as a specific character design, not a general style, technique or idea. That is why cases focus on recognisable characters and near-identical outputs.

Can a 3D character be protected?

Yes. An original 3D character model, its textures, renders and model sheets are protected as creative works. Characters used on products can also be registered as trademarks or designs.

What evidence should I keep for my characters?

Keep dated development files, model sheets, turnarounds, a record of where and when you first published, and captures of any AI copy with the prompt, tool and date.

How can BlendedBoris help?

BlendedBoris records a blockchain timestamp of your Blender files from inside Blender. That gives you dated proof that a character file existed at a certain time. It supports copyright notices and registration but does not replace them.
2026-10-22 16:37 News